Title
Geometric Metaphors in the Enlightenment: Squaring the
Circle of the Mind from Cavendish to Joyce
Introduction
Margaret Cavendish’s Poem, The Circle
of the Brain cannot be Squared,
alongside other historical perspectives on and images of cognition, reveals the
crucial role geometric metaphors played in theorizing the brain and mind in the
17th and 18th centuries. Cavendish, like other Enlightenment writers Cudworth,
Dryden and Pope, develops poetic metaphors that specifically called upon the
use of geometric imagery, primarily circle, square and line, to represent
elements of the brain and mind, as well as to explore the function and power of
each. The circle is specifically employed to represent various phenomena within
neuroscience, specifically due to its complex and perpetual nature. Cavendish
utilizes several other geometric shapes, including squares, triangles and
cubes, which are often used to contrast the infinite circle by way of their
rigid linear structure. While one does not typically associate the immensely
complicated inner workings of the brain or mind with mathematics, let alone
geometry, these writers create unique illusions in which the circle becomes
indicative of a higher faculty and a more bounded, restricted shape (often a
square) represents a lesser one. The influence and esteem of this metaphor has
preserved its relevance up to the present, extending its reach from poetry into
the realm of prose, and has even attained for it a planetary or astronomical
dimension in more modern depictions.
Geometry ¶ Topic Sentence
Before looking at some examples of this
geometric imagery in use, it is essential for one to possess a basic
appreciation for the geometric shapes being anthropomorphized in these literary
works.
Cudworth ¶ Topic Sentence
A primary instance of a circle
exemplifying the supreme cognitive function and a baser geometric arrangement
representing a simpler function can be found in Cudworth’s A Treatise Concerning Eternal and
Immutable Morality.
Cavendish ¶ 1 Topic Sentence
Contrary to the poetic imagery set forth by Cudworth, which
suggests the brain is a linear, mechanical device while the mind is a
cyclically perpetual intangibility, Cavendish proposes that “while the Brain is
round, no Square will be,” from which one can immediately infer that the
circular configuration is still more elusive than the square, but it is now
used to represent the brain, rather than the mind.
Cavendish ¶ 2 Topic Sentence
Cavendish also refers to the imagery of a
line, stating, “…each Brain / Hath on a Line been stretched,” yet proposes a
nuanced conception to that of Cudworth, in which the line represents both
simplicity and a futile effort to map the anatomical structure itself.
Dryden ¶ Topic Sentence
In looking at the use of such geometric
allegory among some of Cavendish’s contemporaries, there becomes a slightly
broader implication to the circular image and its accompanying curiosity.
Pope ¶ Topic Sentence
In a similarly distinct fashion, Pope reconstructs the
macabre atmosphere of Oedipus’ blindness in his poem, The First Book of
Statius his Thebais.
Joyce ¶ Topic Sentence
Finally, the geometric metaphor can be
considered from a more modern perspective with the help of Joyce.
Conclusion
From Cavendish to Joyce, the circle has
been an emblematic marker of the incredible majesty and potential of the human
brain and mind. While geometry is rarely thought of as relevant in a discussion
of cognitive faculties, it is clear that scholars from centuries past and up
through the present find it an integral mode of expressing the seemingly
inexpressible. Conveniently, such geometric imagery has certain flexibility,
meaning it can be applied to any number of scenarios, as the brain and mind are
used in myriad settings. The circle stands as the exemplary shape to represent
human cognition, for the simple reason that it has neither a beginning nor an
end, but rather cycles endlessly.
1: Conclusion and intro have the same themes, but the conclusion is less specific and more brief.
ReplyDeleteOnly the circle shape is mentioned, no examples of usage are given. Might want to mention Joyce in the introduction.
2: All of your topic sentences make claims.
3: Your topics seem to flow nicely, with the exception of the one about Pope, which seems unrelated to the ones before or after. I'm sure this is mostly due to the fact that the paragraphs themselves are missing, however.
4: The conclusion seems like it accounts for all of the topic sentences by summing them up. All of the parts of the conclusion also seem like they are touched upon at some point within the paper.