Explorations in the studies of cognitive science and the literary history of mind
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Tentative Thesis
Le Brun takes a very deterministic approach to the mapping of human emotions and how they manifest themselves physically. While there is much to his work that remains relevant today, modern psychological trends seem to refute the universality of Le Brun's methods, generally taking a more flexible view of this phenomenon. As such, there is room to propose a compromise between the antiquated and the modern, given that emotion does, inherently, manifest in physical form, however, these manifestations vary dramatically from culture to culture, era to era, and, most importantly, from person to person. In Austen's Persuasion and Haddon's The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, particularly, there are clear demonstrations of both correct and incorrect inferences of the physical representations of various emotions. From these instances, the compromise between old and new thoughts becomes more clear.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hi Jacob--
ReplyDeleteThis is a great start... A few informal thoughts from the airport. This still seems pretty big?
The psych frame is nice, but I'm a tiny bit nervous about you having to get into proving (or disproving) LeBrun at large. Would it be possible to pick (are you thinking of picking) one or two facial expressions of strong interest (happiness?/sadness?/desire?) that are relevant to both Persuasion and The Curious Incident? I'm wondering if that'll let you zoom in more closely in your analysis of the literary readings...
Basically, this seems like a good big picture, but looking at BOTH correct and incorrect interpretations of emotions (writ large) might also be big. Esp. with two novels. Would you considering picking one? Or, can you think of other ways to narrow or structure this so that your actual paragraphs don't zoom out into abstraction land, making it hard to pick evidence, or make your thesis as specific as possible?
Can you make your final idea "the compromise between old and new thoughts" more specific to the topic at hand: facial expressions? and the literature? When you deal with the LeBrun, it's probably worth noting the difference between facial expressions as shown in art (visually) & in writing (narrative).
Hope this helps. In office hours tomorrow if needed.
best,
NP